One of my classmates used a system called Zeemaps to let students post their locations visually. Here’s the result so far:
The map can zoom in to show exactly where in Uzbeckistan one student is, or where the two of us are in Virginia — depending on how specific we made the location in Zeemaps. (I just gave my city, not my street address. Some students may have just given a state — or a nation.)
On the day I captured this, only 122 students had pinned themselves on the map. That’s just a beginning. In a reply to one of my posts in the course discussion area last week, Professor Rutger de Graaf apologized for not only being able to respond to messages personally — his enrollment had just passed 37,000. That map could get crowded! But it already shows the marvelous diversity of the student body.
While the course is a basic introduction to concepts and theories in the (itself quite diverse) discipline of “Communication Science,” the online student-created discussions range from “This is Me!” introductions to “Is Communication an Art or a Science?” to “Have we lost our ability to communicate?”and “deliberate gender stereotyping?” — a 70-voice discussion inspired by the professor’s use of a cartoon showing a bouquet of flowers as a way to communicate “you are pretty” in one of his first slideshow lectures.
I’ve already gotten typically verbose trying to explain the structure of various academic “communication” organizations in the United States, where “Mass Communication,” “Media Studies,” “Communication Studies” and “Communication Science” can mix and match from campus to campus due to various quirks of academic organization, allegiance and ancestry. Here are just a few: